The plaintiffs in a civil lawsuit against alleged cheater Mike Postle have filed two new motions this week. This is the latest development in the ongoing cheating saga involving Postle and California card room, Stones Gambling Hall. Coral 50 free bet.
Total life earnings: $539,902. Galemartin casino. Latest cash: $10,054 on 12-Aug-2019. Click here to see the details of Mike Postle's 121 cashes. Mike Postle is at the center of probably the biggest cheating scandal the game of poker has seen at least since the superuser incidents of more than a decade ago at poker sites Ultimate Bet and Absolute Poker. Jan 20, 2021 The latest development in the ongoing saga of Mike Postle isn’t a good one for the poker player who faced cheating allegations after suspicious action on the Stones Gambling Hall live stream. Furthermore, an “undersigned counsel” was also spotted in Postle’s document, which is misleading, since the player already stated that he would be representing himself. Portanova’s name was linked to Postle back in October 2019 when he was reported to be representing the alleged poker cheater.
The fresh motions were filed on April 28, by noted gaming attorney Maurice “Mac” VerStandig, who represents the plaintiffs.
In the first document, the plaintiffs want Postle to be sanctioned for violations of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11, relating to his alleged use of a ghostwriter in crafting his motion to dismiss which was filed on March 25.
The latest filing alleges that Postle’s court papers were written by one or more unidentified attorneys, despite previous declaration by the defendant that he would be representing himself in the case. By allegedly signing and filing court documents that he has not written himself, Postle violated the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
The filing makes reference to a largely similar motion previously filed by William Portanova in another case. Postle allegedly used the same case law and verbatim language in his own motion.
Furthermore, an “undersigned counsel” was also spotted in Postle’s document, which is misleading, since the player already stated that he would be representing himself. Portanova’s name was linked to Postle back in October 2019 when he was reported to be representing the alleged poker cheater. The lawyer later denied that he was representing Postle in the civil case.
The motion accuses Postle of using one or more ghostwriters in the case, as a person without any formal law education or legal training could not have written such perfect motion on his own. The plaintiffs are now seeking to have Postle’s filings struck from the record and want him to deal with the case with his actual lawyer, or by himself, as he earlier claimed.
Plaintiffs Respond to Postle’s Motion To Dismiss
The second court filing counters Postle’s arguments in his motion to dismiss. The player stated that under Californian law, a person cannot be sued for negligence. The plaintiffs responded by saying that Postle cheated and the he can indeed be held liable to his cheating victims, based on numerous case law examples, which also debunk Postle’s idea of unjust enrichment in California.
The filing also responded to Postle’s claim that the original complaint lacks enough justification or evidence to prove that cheating really occurred. The plaintiffs argue that their 54-page filing contains adequate proof of Postle’s misconduct, and that the more specific details can be presented during an actual trial.
As of this writing, there has been no response yet from Postle or Portanova.
The cheating scandal involving Mike Postle and Stones Gambling Hall was brought to light after former Stones commentator Veronica Brill (pictured) posted a series of tweets, exposing Postle’s alleged misconduct during livestreamed games at the poker room in Northern California.
Brill claimed she had a firsthand experience of Postle’s unscrupulous act, which allowed him to amass massive sums of money, amounting to more than $300,000 in just one year. Wpt fallsview 2020. Postle played mostly $1-$3 games.
Brill’s accusations were initially brushed aside by management who previously said the claims had already been investigated and no evidence had been found. But as the poker community did their own investigation into the scandal by scouring game footages, the result of which appeared to favour Brill, Stones was forced to reopen their inquiry and hired a specialist team to dig deeper into the cheating allegations.
Postle Poker News
Weeks after the scandal broke out, Brill opened up about the accusations and what motivated her to expose what would become the biggest cheating scandal in the history of livestreamed poker.
Doug Polk Poker
Brill’s Working Relationship With Stones
Mike Postle Poker News
Brill, who considers herself a recreational player who usually plays cash games and tournaments, was among the first players at Stones when the venue first opened its doors in Northern California and began livestreaming games. Roger Bailey, who pioneered the Stones Live show, was friends with Brill. Roger was the one who put Brill, alongside partner Jake Rosentiel in the commentary booth during the early days of Stones Live.
When the show progressed, more commentary staff were brought in, and Brill slowly moved away from the booth, though she still commentates occasionally.
First Encounter with Postle
Mike Postle Poker
Brill said Postle was among the regulars at Stones and also frequently played in the Sacramento area. He took part in a lot of tournament and cash games, and many considered him just a regular cash game grinder, until his impressive winning streak during livestreamed games at Stones.
Brill revealed Postle was not that popular as a player among poker circles prior to 2018 when he started crushing every livestreamed game at the venue. Brill said she had some friends who had tried playing against Postle in $5-$10 and most of them would attest that he was a losing player.
Cheating suspicions then started to circulate about Postle only choosing to play livestreamed games and avoiding bigger ones. Brill said Postle, most of the time, walked away as the biggest winner in every cash game sessions he took part in.
If someone is displaying a probability of cheating on a live stream you don't make the entire room not be able to use their cellphones in an attempt to reduce everyone's anxiety and then still promote the player as one of the best.
Postle Poker Hat
— Veronica 2.0 (@Angry_Polak) September 28, 2019